Is The Temple Really Necessary?

In John 13, during the last supper, the Savior began to wash the feet of his apostles.  When he came to Peter, he pulled away saying, “Thou shalt never wash my feet.”  In return Jesus said, “If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me.”  What a statement!  Never before in scripture is there any indication of the necessity of allowing your feet to be washed.  I have to wonder what Peter was thinking.  “Wait a minute.  I have been with you from the beginning.  I have been faithful.  You taught us of faith, of repentance, of baptism, and many other qualities we should strive for.  I have done these things.  You never said this was necessary to, “have part with you.”  This is new, and frankly a little weird.  I just don’t get it.”  Wisely, Peter quickly put his faith into practice and allowed this ritualistic ordinance, which was highly symbolic and meant to teach the apostles a great lesson.  It was a blessing beyond what they knew and understood at the time.

 

One thing we learn here is when further blessings are offered from on high, we either accept these blessings or our progress stops there.  This lesson is everywhere in life.  For example, we are offered to learn how to drive a car.  It may be strange and new, and for some very hard, but if we put ourselves out there and learn, the blessings are enormous.

 

Another thing this can be related to is Temple blessings.  Here there are also symbols, ritual and covenants that can seem strange, new and hard to understand at first.  It can be a bigger challenge for some, but the higher blessings can be literally endless.

 

Temples are known to have existed in every known ancient society.  Religious truth was taught in these temples.  We learn the way they taught was through story, sacred ceremony and ritual.  When one examines the oldest ancient religious writings, symbols, sacred architecture and rituals, we can easily see this.1 Which begs the question, what was and is so important about temples which caused them to be such a huge part of every ancient society?

 

We can expect, and in fact we see, that with imperfect man, the meaning and delivery of the rituals and symbols in these temples were changed and distorted through time.  However, we can examine the most ancient of writings to uncover clues as to what the purpose of these temples were in their least disturbed form, with some tantalizing answers, but this can be challenging and can leave us with an uncomplete or dissatisfactory answer, especially given the esoteric nature of temples, not to mention the death and resurrection of Christ necessarily changed much of it as well.  Dallen H. Oaks has said, "Study and reason can find the truth, but only revelation can confirm it."  Only a true living prophet of God could help us to know the ultimate answer to this question of why we have temples.  Today we are blessed with exactly that.  Besides the obvious reasons--that of learning eternal truths, receiving ordinances, of making covenants, and offering these blessings to those who have departed, our current prophet, President Russell M. Nelson gives us further insight on this subject. 

 

“As we strive to live the higher laws of Jesus Christ, our hearts and our very natures begin to change.  The Savior lifts us above the pull of this fallen world by blessing us with great charity, humility, generosity, kindness, self-discipline, peace, and rest.”

 

“We can expect to receive answers to prayer, personal revelation, greater faith, strength, comfort, increased knowledge, and increased power.”

 

“Those who live the higher laws of Jesus Christ have access to His higher power.  Thus, covenant keepers are entitled to a special kind of rest that comes to them through their covenantal relationship with God.”

 

“Time in the temple will help you to think celestial and to catch a vision of who you really are, who you can become, and the kind of life you can have forever, Regular temple worship will enhance the way you see yourself and how you fit into God’s magnificent plan.  I promise you that.”

 

“Here is my promise.  Nothing will help you more to hold fast to the iron rod than worshipping in the temple as regularly as your circumstances permit.  Nothing will protect you more as you encounter the world’s mists of darkness.  Nothing will bolster your testimony of the Lord Jesus Christ and His Atonement or help you understand God’s magnificent plan more.  Nothing will soothe your spirit more during times of pain.  Nothing will open the heavens more.  Nothing!

    The temple is the gateway to the greatest blessings God has in store for each of us, for the temple is the only place on earth where we may receive all of the blessings promised to Abraham.”

 

“Entering into a covenant relationship with God binds us to Him in a way that makes everything about life easier.  Please do not misunderstand me: I did not say that making covenants makes life easy.  In fact, expect opposition, because the adversary does not want you to discover the power of Jesus Christ.  But yoking yourself with the Savior means you have access to His strength and redeeming power.” 

"He is accelerating the pace at which we are building temples.  He is increasing our ability to help gather Israel."2

 

There are many who resent what they perceive as the strictness of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day-Saints.  The covenants we make in the temple only adds to their antagonism.  They want to be free to choose as they will.  They resent the church's perceived attempt to take away their rights.  They have their own ideas and wish to "lean on their own understanding."  But it is hard to hear God's voice when you've already decided what you want him to say.   

It is indeed a challenging church to belong to and stay in good standing.  I believe it is not by chance that it is this way.  It is meant to be that way.  It was made that way for a divine purpose.  The person we become through our trials is enormously better than the person that comes from not having them at all.  

I believe that is one reason we were given doctrine early on in the church's history that on the surface may seem controversial.  Even if we understand these things, we are well aware that the world does not, and we will not be well thought of at best and scorned, persecuted and even killed at worst.  It is a sacrifice to belong to the church.  We sacrifice our time, talents, our world-perceived honor and dignity.  We put it all on the alter of sacrifice.  

Luke 6:22, 23 tells us, Blessed are ye when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.  Rejoice ye in that day, and leap for joy: for, behold, your reward is great in heaven."  Joseph Smith taught, "A religion that does not require the sacrifice of all things never has the power sufficient to produce the faith necessary unto life and salvation." 

Laws, rules, commandments, and covenants to keep them, are not meant to be a bad thing.  They are not meant to take away agency.  In fact, agency will never be taken away.  Besides promoting order, commandments lift us up as people--as children of God.  D&C 130:20, 21 tells us, "There is a law irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated.  And when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated." Also in D&C 88:34, "That which is governed by law is also preserved by law and protected and sanctified by the same."

The Law of Moses was only given to the children of Israel because they would not accept the higher law.  It became a stepping stone to Christ.  In Galatians 3:24, Paul tells us, The law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ."  As we come unto Christ, it seems obvious that we would continue line upon line in our progression, which may include higher laws and covenants.  

Our father in heaven is and will continue to lead us in a heavenly direction.  He knows it can and will be difficult at times, but we are not alone--as we seek his help, he will be there to guide us.  But as the offer to receive more is given to us, we would be wise to put our faith into practice as Peter did, and follow.

 

1-As given in the podcasts, TheAncientTradition.com

 

2-Liahona, “Overcome the World and Find Rest” Oct 2022, and, “Rejoice in the Gift of Priesthood Keys” April 2024

 

An excellent video on The Blessings of higher covenants: here

Was God once a man?

“As man now is, God once was, and as God now is, man may become” --Lorenzo Snow. 

Irenaeus, an early church father, said nearly the same thing.  “We have not been made gods from the beginning, but at first men, then at length gods but following the only true and steadfast Teacher, the Word of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, who did, through His transcendent love, become what we are, that He might bring us to be even what He is Himself. - 1

This is without a doubt one of the most borderline, esoteric teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.  Certainly it challenges ideas that must be reckoned with such as, God is unchangeable, God cannot fall, and the eternality of God.  Not all Latter-day Saints accept the idea which suggest a regression of divine beings. Mormon doctrine on this point can be hazy, both in and out of the church.  Though classified as esoteric, one can make an appropriate claim that this has been taught in the past, not only in our church, but in the Bible as well.

Just as Jesus Christ is a glorified human being, so it can be said of the Father.  Like father, like son.  If one believes Jesus is THE only God there is, then it should be plain--Jesus was a man.

There is much in ancient Christian literature to show a belief that man can become God (theosis), however, there is much less available to show that they believed or understood that God was once a man. Besides the above quote by Irenaeus, interesting examples are found in the Armenian literature. This material shows that at least some Christians may indeed have had a belief that God was once a man.

For example, in one translation of an ancient Armenian Christian document which Michael Stone entitles “Concerning Adam, Eve and the Incarnation,” we find, following Eve’s telling Satan that they would die if they ate the fruit of the tree, that the serpent replies, “That is not so! God was a man like you. When he ate of the fruit of this tree he became God of all.” 2

There is biblical scripture that supports concepts conducive to the idea that God was once a man. One of these is John 5:19-20. “Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. For the Father loveth the son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth.”

Notice this is given in the present tense, "seeth."  But it would not seem to make sense that the Father is doing the same things Jesus is doing at the same time.  But Jesus is rather presently seeing what the Father did.  It can be surmised the Father showed Christ a vision of his own experiences so that Christ could carry these details out. But present tense or not, we are told Jesus follows what the Father did.

There is also a multitude of scripture that can be used to support the idea that God is a holy man with a physical body. One of these is Hebrews 1:3. “Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person.” Christ could only be the exact representation of the Father if the Father himself possessed a body of some sort. In fact, some who wish to avoid what I feel is the plain meaning of Hebrews 1:3 actually go so far as to separate the natures of Christ or declare that the passage could not possibly infer that the Father is embodied.

I believe it is more correct to say that God is exactly as the Bible describes Him—an exalted Man.

The Savior says over and over again that he is the “Son of Man.” It is plain that Jesus is the Son of God; therefore, God must be a Man since God is His Father and Jesus is His Son.

Romans 8:28 tells us that we are to be, 'conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren."  Like father, like son, like all of us.

We are made in the image of God, therefore, God must look like us and we like Him.  James says that men are made in “the similitude of God” (James 3:9).

God is our Eternal Father. He created us in his image, in His exact similitude. We are His offspring (Acts 17:29). If we are His offspring and made in His similitude, and are in His image, then logic dictates that He must be a Man.

Jesus said that if we have seen Him, we have seen the Father (John 14:9). Jesus was a man, therefore, if they are identical, God must also be a man.  What else would, or could He be if He is the Father of Christ and if Christ is in His express image?  

His order in all of creation is that one kind will reproduce to more of the same kind.  Dogs will beget dogs.  Trees will beget trees.  Why would he deviate from this pattern when He begat us?  We are of the same species, but it like an acorn and an oak tree.

He said to Mary, “Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.” (John 20:17) Among other things, this passage teaches that Jesus is not the same being as His and our Father. He is God’s Son, a separate and distinct being. If God were an omnipresent spirit, as some believe, then Christ would not have had to ascend to Him, because the Father would have in fact been Him already. But if He is both Jesus’ Father and Mary’s Father, what must He be?

Stephen saw a vision (view, sight, see, form, shape, appearance, position, location, etc.) of Jesus standing on the right hand (righthand side, not to the left, or beneath, or above, but to the side) of God the Father (a being, a person, someone who occupies space so that Jesus can be to the right of Him), not an amorphous, formless nothing, not an invisible spirit (Acts 7:56).

The form of the Father and Son were never fundamentally different, in scripture, in thought, or in good logic. The heavens tell us in every way, God is a man just like His Son. Straightforward and simple.  If He tells us we can inherit all that the Father has, well, one thing He has is an eternal nature--that He has been God through all eternity.  Then if we can inherit this from Him, did He inherit it as well? As Stephen E. Robinson puts it, "Does the infinite not bestow infinity upon the finite with which it is joined together in one?" 3 

 

1- Against Heresies, Vol. 5: Preface; TANF vol. 1, p.526. In AH 4:38

2- Michael E. Stone, Armenian Apocrypha Relating to Adam and Eve (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1996), 25.

3- How Wide the Divide, p.92.